The LeadersIn Maritime Law

What Is an Allision?

In a collision, two moving objects strike each other; for example, two ships that are passing run into one another. An allision, however, involves an accident where only one of the objects is moving. For instance, this maritime term can refer to an accident where a moving boat runs into a stationary bridge fender.

The Oregon Rule

Per the Oregon Rule, when a moving object hits a stationary object, the moving object is presumed at fault. The moving vessel thus has the burden of proving an alternate theory of causation to show the stationary object was actually at fault. For example, in the case of a ship striking a bridge, it could be argued that the fender is there to protect vessels and not the bridge. If instead, the vessel owner or operator could prove that the bridge fender was blocking the waterway or was incorrectly installed, the stationary object could be shown to be at fault for the allision.

The Pennsylvania Rule

In the case of The Pennsylvania, two commercial ships (a sailing vessel and a steamer) collided off of the New Jersey coast during dense fog. The accident caused the sailing vessel to sink and for 6 of the 10 crewmembers to drown. The owner of the sailing vessel subsequently sued the owner of the steamer for damages.

Both the United States District Court of New York and the Second Circuit found the steamer at fault for the accident due to its excessive speeds of travel. However, the Supreme Court also found the sailing vessel partially at fault for violating a statutory rule. Per the court, the sailing vessel was required to blow a foghorn; however, the vessel only rang their bell—despite the heavy fog.

According to the conclusion of the court:

"But when, as in this case, a ship at the time of a collision is in actual violation of a statutory rule intended to prevent collisions, it is no more than a reasonable presumption that the fault, if not the sole cause, was at least a contributory cause of the disaster. In such a case the burden rests upon the ship of showing not merely that her fault might not have been one of the causes, or that it probably was not, but that it could not have been. Such a rule is necessary to enforce obedience to the mandate of the statute."

Therefore, the Pennsylvania Rule was born. This rule deals directly with accidents that occur because one party violated a statutory rule. In these cases, the party in violation needs to not only prove their wrongdoing did not cause the accident, but that it could not have even contributed to the cause of the accident.

Mike Hooks Dredging v. Marquette Transportation Gulf-Inland, LLC

In 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit heard the case of an allision in the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (ICW), where a passing vessel hit a moored dredge. While the Oregon Rule would typically apply in this case, it was found that the company operating the dredge was in violation of Inland Navigation Rule 9 for mooring in a narrow channel, which caused the rule of The Pennsylvania to be triggered. While the owner of the dredge argued that the Pennsylvania Rule did not apply because the dredge was not obstructing navigation in the waterway, the Fifth Circuit ultimately rejected that argument.

If you have questions about allisions and how maritime law applies, contact us at (888) 346-5024!

What is it Like To Work With Arnold & Itkin

Arnold & Itkin represented nearly a third of the crewmembers injured in the Deepwater Horizon explosion.

I encountered professionalism, understanding, compassion… lot of compassion. They really felt for what me and my wife were going through.
~ Deepwater Horizon Crew Member

Work with a lawyer who truly understands Maritime Law.

Because maritime law is so complex and so complicated, it is crucial that you work with an attorney who has an in-depth understanding of how it works and who has proven themselves in similar cases before.

Related Maritime Videos
  • Arnold & Itkin has represented offshore workers nationwide and has recovered billions of dollars. Watch this video to learn how and why that matters.

  • Arnold & Itkin has achieved record-setting verdicts for offshore workers across the country, representing survivors and victims of the nation’s biggest offshore tragedies.

  • At Arnold & Itkin, our success can be traced to one core belief that we've held throughout the years: every case is personal to our team.

  • At Arnold & Itkin, we pride ourselves on giving our clients access to the best lawyers and best legal team possible. Because that's how you get the best results.

  • Our founding partners have worked together for more than a decade.

  • We know this a difficult time. Let us help.

Discuss Your Legal Rights & Options

Free Case Evaluation

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your email address.
  • Please enter your phone number.
  • Please make a selection.